Monday, April 16, 2007

Pain Pain Pain

The readings for this week focused on pain as well as social cognition. I found one of the most interesting topics is the relationship between what is occurring on an internal level, as well as a social one. For example, pain has been proved to be hugely subjective, affected largely by cognition. Within “Why rejection hurts: a common neural alarm system for physical and social pain,” researchers discovered that the presence of social support increases an individual’s tolerance of electric shock stimulation. We will expand upon this during our presentation this week, but Carolyn and I read an article on this topic, which found that positive expectations during a painful experience actually decreased the level of pain experienced. It seems that our psychological approach to a situation actually does have an internal effect on our bodies. At several points during the semester, we have discussed the power of the mind on the rest of the body. This concept of pain as subjective seems to be another good example of that.

I was particularly intrigued by the article, “How we predict what other people are going to do” by Chris and Uta Frith. They found that “amygdala activation has been consistently shown as a sign of fear that is elicited unconsciously by viewing a face from another race. When white Americans were shown the faces of unknown black Americans, activity was elicited in the amygdala… The amygdala response to black faces was reduced when the faces were presented for 525 ms rather than 30 ms, and, associated with this reduction, there was increased activity in areas of frontal cortex concerned with control and regulation.” (Page 2) It appears that the patients tried to shift their immediate reaction, thus leading to the reduced amygdala activity. This relationship between their primary reaction and an attempt at mental control was striking for me.

Further, during their discussion of our ability to predict the actions of others, they noted that the process is not selective to a biological target (Page 4). My conference work is about emotional responses to music and I came upon a similar finding. Research has noted that learning music is about making predictions. We can guess the course of a song without ever having heard it, because of a natural understanding of pattern and structure. Additionally, we make predictions based on our prior experience with songs. Thus, when the Friths noted that we are able to make judgments about non-biological targets, I was reminded of my own research. I liked all of the readings for this week, but was continuously struck by the interplay between what is occurring internally and how that is affected by external, social situations.

5 comments:

Ali said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Ali said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Naomi Bishop said...

The idea imbedded racism is fascinating--Daniel Schacter addresses this as well: How much harder is it to overcome racism when there is a physiological alarm system? Does that mean society's ideas has infiltrated so much to the point that it becomes an automatic response, no matter if we view ourselves as 'racist' or 'non-racist' people to our conscious judgment?

And yes, some people, I think, do have a better tolerance for pain--both physical and emotional. Is this based on past experience, genetics, neurological structures, all combined?

Julia said...

I just saw a production of "Quills" that my friend was in which is about the Marquis de Sade after he is put in a mental institution, and I remember this line someone said that he is the only man on earth whose heaven is hell. the entire play focused on whether or not he was the one with the psychological disease or the institution around him. It got me thinking a lot about the cognition of pain, how we interpret it is entirely subjective, yet it can also be, in a sense, a conscious decision. if we choose to experience pain as pleasure does this automatically make it happen? if we try to suppress feelings of pain, especially emotional pain, is this healthy in the long run? in the end of the play the clergyman who runs the asylum goes insane himself, partially because he becomes "sadistic" in the end but also because of his own personal effort to understand the psychology of the Marquis.

Joan Davisson said...

I have really taken for granted my whole life the fact that I'm able to understand that when someone says something, and it involves the mismatch of the verbal and emotional components, like when someone tells a joke that i'm able to find funny, that it is because of my brain's ability to synthesize it with both sides. Adolph's discussion of the difficulties that people who are born with a corpus collosum have may seem trivial, but little things in social interaction, such as sharing in the understanding of a joke, can be very important to social development, especially self-confidence.

Another interesting note about this week's readings was in the article about pain in prematures babies. I found it especially intriguing to read that children born prematurely are about 2.6 times more likely to have ADD. This was confirmed in my mind by the fact that my older brother was the only one out of me and my three siblings to be premature, and he's the only one of us with ADD. It's devastating to think of the prevalence of pre-term deliveries all over the world, and th myriad challenges, disorders, and difficulties that can result from it later in life.